About Me

Name: Jonathan Cooke
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Friend's Blogs

Britain Declines as World Power

Britain, Doing an Imitation of a Monty Python Skit, Hastens Their Decline as a World Power

“You fight with the strength of many men, Sir knight.”

Britain once ruled nearly a quarter of the globe. The British Navy used to be, between the early 18th to the middle of the 20th centuries, the most powerful navy in the world. An empire was built with that navy as its backbone, giving the empire its ability to project its political will over vast distances. If you are reading this in English, you have been touched by the British Empire.

“I command you, as King of the Britons to stand aside.”

In the few years since World War II, England has cut back its armed forces time and time again. Whittling it away from the world’s most foremost, to barely even in the top ten for its navy, and its Army now ranks 22nd in the world in number of troops.

“'Tis but a scratch.”
“A scratch? Your arm's off.”


In a 30 year period British armed forces have declined from 338,400 personnel in 1975 to 195,900 in 2005. That’s a staggering 42% decline. That’s cutting the Royal Navy down from 76,200 personnel down to 39,400, a massive 48% cut. The British Army was cut down from 167,100 to a mere 108,800, a 35% cut. The Royal Air Force dropped from 95,000 to a paltry 56,900, a 40% cut. They're not even finished, more cuts are on the horizon.

“No, it isn't.”
“Well, what's that then?”


British defense spending is now a pitiful 2.2% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the lowest level since the 1930’s. In comparison, the United States which actually has a somewhat low percentage of GDP spent on its armed forces due to its massive 13 trillion dollar economy spends at least a healthier 3.7% of its GDP on defense, which for 2007 was budgeted at 439 billion dollars with additional funding of 120 billion as a supplement for the Middle East and discretionary spending that for 2008 puts it at around 640 billion USD (around 314 billion British pounds, or around 450 billion Euros).

“I've had worse.”

That 2.2% of British GDP on defense actually places it behind France, which is not exactly famous for being able to defend itself the last two times the Germans came round to visit. The old adage of the French planting trees along their country roads so that the Germans can march in the shade may not be far from the truth. Britain might consider planting shade trees as well, so their future conquerors can experience the same hospitality.

“You haven't got any arms left.”

While the Brits are actually building two new “Elizabeth” class aircraft carriers, as some might point out, they’re not really what we would consider to be carriers at all. With a gross displacement of only 65,000 tons they are more in the category of what the U.S. Navy would call Amphibious Assault Ships, not much larger than the USN Wasp class, which displaces 40,000 tons. A far cry from the 12 USN carriers of which a Nimitz class is over 100,000 tons and carries almost double the aircraft, 90 as opposed to a distinctly lower 48 aircraft. With only two carriers total at any given time Britain can be expected to deploy only one single carrier (with only 48 aircraft) anywhere in the world. Not too far without refueling either, since instead of dual nuclear reactors these baby-carriers are being built to run on gas turbines which means they will needs refueling every 10k nautical miles instead of every 10 years or so. (The U.S. Navy opperates around 80 nuclear powered vessels, not just the carriers). Hardly a force projection that will make anyone’s knees shake. That’s if they both actually are built, they’re not even expected until 2014, and the second in 2016.

“I'm invincible!”

Britain has been a great ally of the United States. We have fought together side by side through two World Wars, and through the Cold War. I don’t think anyone on either side of the Atlantic wants to see what the British call the “Special Relationship” between our nations end due to an inability of either side to be able to stand next to the other in combat. This makes it especially disheartening to see a nation with as rich a history as Britain, and an historically close ally, remove itself of an ability to project force throughout the world and no longer be even capable of standing next to us in the decades and centuries to come.

“I'll bite your legs off!“

I truly hope Brits reading this aren’t offended, and perhaps become inspired to demand of their leaders an expansion of their armed forces, instead of continued reductions. The United States and Britain have a history in the 20th and 21st centuries of fighting side by side. It will be a sad day if Britain reaches a point where it is no longer capable of arriving at the fight, or no longer capable of throwing a punch. If the situation is allowed to devolve to that level, they will be sorely missed.


Jonathan RF Cooke
October 11, 2007

For more articles ...
[ Go to the main blog of Jonathan Cooke at
http://coffee.townhall.com ]

Sources:
http://www.mapsofworld.com/world-top-ten/world-top-ten-countries-with-largest-navies-map.html
http://www.navy.mil/navydata/navy_legacy_hr.asp?id=146
http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed060407c.cfm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Armed_Forces#Current_strength
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Nimitz_(CVN-68)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Armchair General, Oct 9th (Humor).

To the rescue of the World, here are the latest grains of wisdom, or at least opinion, from The Armchair General.

Troops, there are quite a few disturbing events happening across the globe at the moment and I believe that, given the opportunity, I could solve them all from the comfort of my armchair. Now I’m certainly not suggesting I could solve them to everyone else’s satisfaction, I’m talking complete dictatorship here folks, but I am thoroughly convinced that I would glean a tremendous amount of enjoyment from enacting the following …


Zimbabwe

I would appoint Robert Mugabe as president of the World Bank. His ill-conceived and downright ludicrous financial policies would completely devastate that communistic wealth redistribution institution. The World Bank has the stated goal of “reduction of global poverty”. This is achieved by taking money from where it naturally grows in the fertile fields of industrialized nations and transplanting it into the barren dirt of nations that are stuck in the Mud Age, where all that lovely capital dries up and withers before our eyes. It would take a World Bank President of inconceivable fiscal incompetence to destroy that institution quickly enough for my satisfaction, and I believe that the unfathomable stupidity of President-For-Now Robert Mugabe may not only be up to the task but perhaps could exceed my wildest expectations. So moved.

Iran

They have oil, so we can’t nuke them, as tempting as that might be. However their armed forces wouldn’t even be capable of withstanding an organized attack from the NRA so I would drop leaflets over the state of Georgia informing them that Iranians are Florida Gator fans and that they are doing something rather disturbing to a Bulldog. After the smoke clears and Iran is firmly part of The New South I would have President Marmaduke Ivebeenreallybad placed on a new sitcom where his lines are voiced over by the South Park team to come out purely as “Durka durka”.

Palestinian Territories

As soon as I can find a magnifying glass powerful enough to locate their whimsical little wannabe country on a globe I’ll order a nuclear strike on them. After developing a nuclear weapon small enough that it won’t be bothersome to neighboring nations. Nothing in the range of megatons or even kilotons, perhaps a one-megapound strike should be enough to defeat those idolatrous infidels, may the fleas of a thousand mangy camels infest their sweaty armpits. They don’t want a country anyway, they certainly haven’t done anything to show that they’re capable of governing themselves, so after the mushroom cloud dissipates put that land on the auction block and sell it to the highest bidder, assuming they’re not Arabs.

Venezuela

I’d stop giving Hugo Chavez any media attention whatsoever. I mean, seriously. He’s about as threatening as Barney Rubble. Whether he gets overthrown or creates a new Cuba his country isn’t important enough to interrupt a beer commercial over. I am curious about Venezuela’s parachute industry though. Hugo Chavez isn't exactly anorexic, so if he was able to parachute out of an aircraft without ending up as road-pancake then they’re producing some really fine nylon chutes in that nation.

The Soviet ... I mean Russia


At least they hate many of the same people we do now, and that ain’t too bad. Now they’re not commies anymore we might be able to make some progress with them. I wouldn’t shut down NORAD just yet though, and I’ll still keep those missiles primed and ready to go, just in case. As a peace gesture we should export them some orange juice so they don't have to drink their Vodka straight anymore, or at least they won't have to taste it as much. Bleah. The FSB is the KGB, they simply changed the sign on the door, it's business as usual. Russians are to be avoided in restaurants if you didn't bring a Geiger counter.

Japan

I would force the Japanese to allow tourism on their whaling ships. I know they’re trying to pretend that their whaling industry is for scientific research (namely researching how many whales can be harpooned before dinnertime) but that sure looks like fun, and I’d damned well make them let me have a shot or two. Now that’s fishing!

Britain

Mostly harmless, at the moment. Becoming a Muslim caliphate though. Has reduced it’s navy to the point of three men in a bathtub but they can be quite deadly with a well aimed bar of soap. If you can keep them off the warm beer long enough they might start to notice that headscarves and hijabs aren’t traditional British clothing styles. All their guns have been confiscated already so whatever happens to them will probably just involve beer bottles being thrown at each other, perhaps that could be made into a sporting event on ESPN.

That's it for now troops, stay tuned for more from ...


The Armchair General,
General Max Xenophobe, (fict.)

a.k.a. Jonathan RF Cooke,
October 9th, 2007

For more articles ...
[ Go to the main blog of Jonathan Cooke at
http://coffee.townhall.com ]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Clinton Strong-Arms Magazine to Drop Negative Article

Magazine GQ Bows to Pressure From Camp Hillary, Pulls Article Negative About Her Campaign

hillary clintonHillary Clinton has shown her true colors once again. Of course she may claim it’s all “a vast right-wing conspiracy …” as she has claimed in the past when stories first surfaced about Bill Clinton having an affair with Monica Lewinsky [1], although it may be difficult to call this a right wing conspiracy since GQ magazine themselves have admitted to pulling the article under pressure. “I don’t really get into the inner workings of the magazine, but I can tell you that, yes, we did kill a Hillary piece.” said Jim Nelson, the Editor in Chief of GQ.
 
The article GQ pulled, despite protests from employees at the magazine, had apparently mentioned infighting within the ranks of her campaign for the presidency, as well as other topics not considered to shed her campaign in the best of lights. Upon learning of the upcoming article, the Clinton campaign went into full combat mode and told GQ magazine that if they published that article the magazine would lose all access to Bill, which coincidentally is the subject of an upcoming article GQ has scheduled for their December cover piece, ‘Man of the Year’.

The Clinton campaign has declined to comment, little surprise. Power leveraging negative articles out of the press before they are even published certainly suggests her campaign machine is running at full steam, however.

Josh Green (Senior Editor, The Atlantic Monthly), who has written about Camp Clinton in ways they didn’t approve of before, wrote the offending article that was quashed.[3].  The aides of Clinton approached the magazine and threatened to withdraw all cooperation with an article being written for the December issue by George Saunders who is much more favorable to the Clintons, Saunders even traveled with Bill Clinton to Africa in July. Rather than risk their Clinton-friendly December cover article they dropped the negative article by Josh Green straight into the can, exactly as they were requested to do by the Clinton campaign. Heil Klinton!

Where is Austin Powers? “That’s not a woman, that’s a man, baby!”

Jonathan RF Cooke
September 26, 2007

For more articles ...
[ Go to the main blog of Jonathan Cooke at
http://coffee.townhall.com ]

References:
1. The Today Show, Jan 17th 1998, said during an interview with Matt Lauer.
2. The Times (London), Sept. 26th 2007, article “Hillary and Bill Clinton show muscle as cover boy Bill gets a negative story dumped”.
3. Daily Telegraph, Sept 26th 2007, article “Clintons persuade GQ to pull critical article”.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Cooling Panic (Humor)

The author catches up on his reading, and is alarmed by back issues.

Wednesday evening I thought I would catch up with a little reading that I haven’t seemed to have made time for recently. My subscriptions are a tad outdated; blowing off layers of dust, pausing for a hacking cough and brief sneezing fit as years of detritus suddenly become airborne and penetrate my lungs and sinus cavity, I am able to make out the faded dates on the covers and realize that I certainly do seem to be rather behind the times. Oh well, there’s no time like the present to catch up on one's reading!

With my feet plopped down on an old crackled-leather ottoman that has more wrinkles than an English Bulldog and with myself snuggled comfortably into a recliner as deep as the Marianas Trench I settle down with a hot mug of cocoa and begin catching up on my reading.

First I pick up a copy of the New York Times. Hmm. Let’s see what’s happening in the world shall we? Here’s an article that looks interesting, it’s titled “Prospects of Another Glacial Period. Geologists Think the World May Be Frozen Up Again” [1]. Uh-oh, what’s this? That doesn’t sounds too good. What are they talking about? I read on …“The question is again being discussed whether recent and long-continued observations do not point to the advents of a second glacial period.” Oh no, and just when I got nice and snuggly warm! I reach for the blanket on the back of the recliner and plop it over my toeseys; I’m determined not to be worried so I discard the article to read something else instead. Here’s another issue of the New York Times, five years later. Hopefully the danger has passed. What is this issue saying? “Professor Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age”! Yee gads! I run upstairs and grab a down comforter, get another cup of cocoa and wrap myself up securely back into my recliner. Oh dear, this sounds terrible!

Wrapped up again with a fresh steaming cup of cocoa I grab another news publication and continue to read on. I’ll skip the New York Times; it was only getting me worried. I pick up a Los Angeles Times instead. “The possibility of another Ice Age already having started …” [2]. Argh! I throw it down, and pick up something else hurriedly. “Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada” [3]. No, it can’t be! I grab another. “We must be just teetering on an Ice Age ...” [4]. I jump up from my recliner and make a mad run upstairs to my linen closet. Grabbing all the blankets and comforters that two arms can physically carry I launch myself downstairs barely touching the steps and dart underneath the pile. Heck, the ice must almost be here by now! These articles aren’t exactly recent!

Sweltering a little under the myriad of heavy covers I carry on reading, I pick up Science News. “The cooling since 1940 has been large enough and consistent enough that it will not soon be reversed,” [5]. No, this just can’t be! I pick up another, International Wildlife, this should be safe. “There is no reason why the Ice Age should not start in earnest in our lifetimes.” I grab another, Newsweek, “The Cooling World” [6], in which scientists are suggesting that to help offset the Global Cooling we could try to melt the Polar Ice Caps in an effort to help warm up the Earth! I dive from underneath my blankets and start loading wood into my fireplace. Yes, we need to warm up the planet to prevent this massive Ice Age from freezing us all solid!

As I write this I'm trying to start another fire by cranking up my barbeque grill. I hope the ice isn't getting too close yet, I'm trying to get it as warm as possible before the glaciers come.

I’m a little low on wood. I grab the entire stack of magazines and newspapers and shove them into my fireplace. Yes, that should help!

Jonathan RF Cooke
September 13, 2007

References
1. New York Times. February 24, 1895.
2. Los Angeles Times. June 28, 1923.
3. Chicago Tribune. Aug 9, 1923.
4. The Atlantic. December 1932.
5. Science News. March 1, 1975.
6. Newsweek, April 18, 1975.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Activists?

32-year-old annual charity event stopped as being disrespectful to a dead fish. Animal rights nut jobs rejoice.

In the English town of Lyme Regis, Dorset, for 32 years running (until 2006) they have held an event called Lifeboat Week. The event being run by the Royal Navy Lifeboat Institution (RNLI), which as it sounds like it does, saves human lives (to the tune of around 22 lives per day. [1]). As part of their fund raising efforts they would have a Conger Cuddling contest. The Conger is a fish, plentiful off the coast of England, quite tasty I hear. The idea of the contest, typical of British eccentricity, is that people stand on flowerpots and have to dodge a fish being swung at them on a rope. The team that has the most members still standing on their flowerpots at the end of the game, wins. [2].

The fish are donated by anglers who instead of eating them, chose to donate some of their catch to be frozen specifically for this charity event.

That was until an animal rights activist sent an anonymous email stating that this charity event was “disrespectful” to the fish, and furthermore, if the event was not cancelled this activist would unleash the hounds of hell in a campaign against the Lifeboat Institution to boycott its fundraising efforts. Proving once again that liberals hold animals as being more important that human life.

First, the email was anonymous. We’re not even talking about a “campaigner” who was even willing to identify themselves. Secondly, the fish was already dead. Would it have been any different to drive down to the local supermarket and pick out a fish from the display case? Thirdly, how the heck can you be disrespectful to a fish in the first place? Is it possible to offend a cheeseburger? Can you insult a strip of bacon? Once it’s dead, food is food! You can’t hurt the feelings of pork chop for goodness sake. Do I even need another point? Oh yes, this event was to raise money to save human lives, silly me for thinking that might be important.

So did the RNLI laugh as they hit the delete key? Not quite. As ludicrous as this self-professed activist demand was, the RNLI immediately put an end to the Conger Cuddling event. Why? Because of the culture of fear and intimidation that the leftist activists have permeated throughout England, as they have throughout Europe in general. The status quo have become so cow-towed that they are terrified of standing up to even so much as an anonymous email threat made over the internet concerning an already dead fish.

That's how much power they they have, how much fear they can wield. This is where we will end up, if we allow leftist activists in the United States enough ground that their tail starts wagging our dog.


Jonathan RF Cooke
September 11th, 2007


For more articles ...
[ Go to the main blog of Jonathan Cooke at
http://coffee.townhall.com ]

References
1.
www.rnli.org.uk website.
2. Daily Mail, 28th July 2006.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Marriage is Holy Water Against Welfare

Single Parent Female Households Top Welfare Recipients.

Being avidly against our ever-encroaching Nanny State, and rampant Liberalism I was wondering today what affects our nation’s liberal policies have had upon the percentage of participation in our Welfare machine. I was curious as to the rise in welfare entitlement dependency and found something rather interesting.

Since I’ve often heard about the liberation of women raising children by themselves, without the need of a father in the child’s upbringing, it was fascinating to learn that only 6.6% of the recipients of government welfare are married. It would seem that marriage is to welfare what holy water is to vampires.

As to those liberated new-age women? Well it seems that households maintained solely by women are 5 times more likely to participate in the welfare system. [1]. That doesn’t sound very liberating to me. Now I was expecting somewhat of a parallel with families being raised solely by a male, since being a single parent is difficult. Nope. The single father households only accounted for 16 percent, compared to the greater than double rate of 37 percent of female run families using the welfare system. [1].

So much for that liberated new turkey-baster inseminated modern woman argument I’ve been hearing for so long. If you’re going to raise a child, that child still needs a mother and a father apparently, and married ones at that. I’m glad the world hasn’t changed that much yet.

Jonathan RF Cooke
September 11th, 2007

For more articles ...
[ Go to the main blog of Jonathan Cooke at
http://coffee.townhall.com ]

References
1. (Dynamics of Economic Well-Being: Program Participation, 1996 to 1999 Who Gets Assistance? Published January 2004 by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dems pander to Hispanics/Illegals with Spanish-only debate

For the first time in U.S. history, presidential candidates held a televised debate conducted in Spanish. It was broadcast from the University of Miami and carried on Univision, a U.S. based Spanish-only television channel, September 9th 2007.

The entire debate was conducted in Spanish. Candidates were asked questions in Spanish, and the candidates’ replies were translated into Spanish and broadcast out in Spanish. American viewers wanting the debate in English in their own country had to turn on closed captioning (not a joke).

Democrats Hillary Clinton, Chris Dodd, John Edwards, Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich, Barack Obama and Bill Richardson were broadcast for 90 minutes on Univision's television channel, AM radio station and via a live web feed.

All of the Democratic candidates announced that they had plans to legalize the illegal immigrants that have already found ways into the United States. Hillary Clinton spat out acid by saying that Republican legislation to penalize those who hire illegals, "would have criminalized Jesus Christ!" Mike Gravel spouted off that "We are all immigrants!". Bill Richardson regretted that the audience was unable to hear the presidential candidates themselves actually speaking in Spanish instead of merely hearing a translation, and Kucinich, possibly drunk on ego at that point, declared that as President he would make Spanish an official second language of the United States.

DNC chair Howard "I have a Scream" Dean, in speaking of the debate, attacked Republicans with the accusation that the GOP will routinely "scapegoat Hispanic immigrants for political gain", this statement was translated into Spanish before being broadcast on the Spanish-only television channel.

Democrats have been wooing Hispanics for some time now. During the protests held by illegal aliens in 2006 with thousands marching while waving Mexican flags on American soil at those protests the Democrats were handing out posters written in Spanish urging those same illegal aliens to register to vote, which unfortunately is all too easy for illegals to accomplish. Hispanics now outnumber Blacks in the United States as the minority group and have done so for five years now (U.S. Census Bureau, 2007) so they certainly have the potential to swing elections if recruited en mass, which is exactly what the Democratic war machine is rolling towards.

Jonathan RF Cooke
September 10th, 2007

For more articles ...
[ Go to the main blog of Jonathan Cooke at
http://coffee.townhall.com ]
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Media Gloom, Inc.

Doom and Gloom of Media Sensationalizing Distorts True Picture of America.

News media is a business, out to make a profit, make no mistake. Sensationalizing stories increases viewership, which in turn increases advertisers, leading to greater profits. To “sauce up” a story is in their best interests, to merely report the bland flavor of humdrum mundane news would be completely against their business model. It would in fact be idiotic.
Furthermore, that business has become entertainment. Watch your nightly news and notice similarities with other forms of television entertainment. First, the news has a “Theme Song”. Why would objective, fact reporting journalism need theme music? As you continue to become absorbed by the movie, I mean news, you might take note of the high dollar special effects. Spinning three-dimensional logos, animated graphics, elaborate sets and backdrops. The only thing missing is a concession stand selling popcorn.

They are using Hollywood tactics also. Fear and suspense are standard movie ingredients. How often do you hear on the news the baited fishing line lures such as, “Learn how to protect your family from a new threat, details at 11 o’clock.” “There’s a new scam that you need to be aware of, coming up later in the program.”

If you don’t think your news is entertainment yet, ask yourself why morning news shows are starting to show more segments that are blatantly not related to anything whatsoever to do with news. Cooking segments, with chefs? Screaming throngs of fans waving their arms in the air as if they are at a concert, standing outside for a chance to see the rock stars, I mean newsreaders.

What are the recurrent themes of this entertainment machine? What sells best, of course. Murders, robberies, wars, child abuse, stock market crashes, home invasions, car jacking, financial scams, elderly abuse, dog fighting, missing white women, airline crashes, terrorism. Watching all this you would think the world is becoming a terrible place, a dangerous place in which to live where you are constantly at risk of your very life and limb. Despite the fact that the world is now safer to live in than it has ever been.

  • The average lifespan in the United States has increased from 47 years in 1900 to an amazing 77 years at the turn of the century, that’s a whopping 64% increase. The media tells you of terrible surgical mistakes, and bad doctors though.
  • The U.S. BLS and Census Bureau shows the per capita income Americans grew 76.6% from 1947 to 1997, however your television news paints a grim picture of the stock market, unemployment, your retirement future in shambles.
  • Home ownership has increased from from 46.5% in 1900 almost 20 points to 66.2% in 2000, but your television is portraying the doom and gloom of the housing market bubble bursting.
  • The media machine tells terrible losses in the Middle East but would it surprise you to learn that there was a greater loss of life in 20th century wars you may not have even heard of, such as the Russian Civil War (over 90 times as many), the Second Congo War (over 130.8 times as many) and the Second Sino-Japanese War (over 200 times as many) as examples.
  • The media convinces you that our schools are failing, that students can no longer learn in them. Yet it’s interesting that the percentage of children entering into college is the highest level it has ever been in U.S. history with 28% completing 4 or more years of college in 2006 compared to a miniscule 4.6% in 1940. An amazing improvement, one which your television doesn't tell you about.
  • The media tells you that nobody can afford health insurance, that people just can’t get coverage. Interesting that the Census Bureau’s 2006 report shows that 84.2% of Americans have health insurance. Compared to a hundred years ago, well, we can’t compare to that since health insurance didn’t even exist a hundred years ago. But it’s all doom and gloom.

The entire country is by far better than it has ever been, yet the media machine keeps pulling you further into it’s clutches by selling you a picture of despair and misery, pain and suffering, violence and death. And we fall for it. More Americans are in psychotherapy now than ever, with an increase of people being treated for depression rising 223.5% between 1987 and 1997. We drug our children with kiddy-Prozac since it seems all children now have ADHD, or so our television tells us, so we drug them like obedient automatons. When will we turn off that spew of drivel and start seeing our country for what it really is, a successful, wealthy, wonderful and free place to live.

Jonathan RF Cooke
September 6th, 2007

For more articles ...
[ Go to the main blog of Jonathan Cooke at
http://coffee.townhall.com ]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Parking Lot Paroxysm

Your Rights End when the Parking Lot Begins.

Imagine, if you will, the proverbial ‘little old lady’ driving in her car fresh from an invigorating Sunday church service. On her way home to reflect on the pastor’s sermon she stops by her local grocery store for a half-gallon of milk and a dozen eggs. As she exits her vehicle she hums to herself one of her favorite hymns. It’s ‘Onward Christian Soldiers’, and the tune is recognized by the alert ears of  a store employee collecting shopping carts. “Ma’am, are you coming from church this morning? You wouldn’t happen to have a Bible in your vehicle would you?” Well certainly, I’m sure she would proclaim. “Ma’am, I’m going to have to ask you to leave the parking lot. Please leave immediately. If you fail to do so I will contact the police, have you arrested, and prosecuted.”

Absolutely ridiculous, you say? Well if the parking lot is located in Florida, this scenario is not only possible, but also completely legal according to the position of the Florida Chamber of Commerce. It’s more than likely this could apply to your State as well. For Florida, the Chamber of Commerce is thoroughly convinced that private property laws supersede Constitutional rights. Florida Senate Bill SB-2356 and Florida House bill HB-1417 were introduced early in the 2007 legislative session to prohibit business owners from banning any legal personal property from automobiles while those vehicles are in the business’ parking lots. Let me say that again, with emphasis, “any legal personal property”. These bills, intended as an affirmation of your already existent rights in order to prevent abuses of those rights, were shot down with so much red faced vein-popping vitriol you might have expected legislature’s fists and teeth to be flying. They nearly were.

If you didn’t already know, you may have spotted the telling ripples of some shadowy and hideous beast lurking beneath the surface of the attack on this clarifying legislation. It’s barely even hiding, you can clearly see its sharpened fangs glistening from within its maniacal rictus of a grin. It’s the anti-gun lobby, or to adopt the predictable habits of their parlance, “Big Anti-Gun”.

“What do guns have to do with Bibles? They’re probably only trying to prohibit guns aren’t they?” (And I do shudder at using the term “only” within that sentence, being an avid gun enthusiast and owner myself.) Therein is the pinnacle of this slippery slope though. No matter which side of the fence you might sit on regarding legal gun ownership there is a great danger to all once private businesses believe themselves to have the ability to prohibit any such items as they should see fit from your legal possession, and furthermore conduct searches for such possessions within your securely locked private automobile, and with the sheer unmitigated audacity to proclaim that the authority to do so was granted to them merely by your driving into their parking lot.

“You’re sensationalizing! That would never actually happen!” Tell that to the ex-employees of the Weyerhaeuser paper mill, Valliant Oklahoma, which is considered a test case prompting the Florida legislation. On October 1st, 2002, as a result of an employee drug overdose the management of the mill questionably brought in drug-sniffing dogs to conduct a search of employee automobiles within their parking lot. Although searching for drugs the dogs brought in had actually been cross-trained to also search for explosives and firearms. During the drug search the dogs identified legally owned firearms within the vehicles of 12 employees. Although being in completely legal possession those 12 employees were subsequently terminated 2 days later on October 3rd. The reasoning being that the company stated it has a policy against firearms within vehicles on their parking lot, and they saw their own private policy as prevailing over both Federal laws and State laws that permitted those employees to legally own and posses those firearms no matter where they were parked. Did I say legally possessed firearms? I’ll utter the overwhelmingly mitigating, nay, policy negating point once again that the firearms were legally possessed.

This should disturb you. If a parking lot can strip you of your Constitutional rights, gun owner or not, you might worry about what other rights you might be nonchalantly stripped of if the removal of those rights is so ardently defended and so readily permitted to endure. Perhaps the loss of the 13th Amendment would be of concern if, upon driving into a business parking lot, you find yourself sold into slavery. The loss of the right to free speech, trial by jury, the right to vote, freedom of religion? Regardless of which particular right the suppression of might personally affect you most, the suppression of any of them at all is something that I truly hope causes you grievous concern.

Are you sure they sabotaged protection of personal private property rights? Is that really what the bill was protecting? Read it for yourself, it is a matter of public record. The Florida Senate has the text of the undermined bill online at Flsenate.gov and you’ll be looking for the “Individual Personal Private Property Protection Act of 2007”, Senate Bill SB-2356 (c1), which was stabbed to death on the floor of the Senate, in a manner reminiscent of Caesar, on May 4th, 2007. The corresponding House bill was garroted and left to a floundering death on April 18th, 2007. You can witness the timeline of its birth and demise online at the myFloridaHouse.gov website.

“Well, it’s still just a typical knee-jerk reaction, they’ve only applied this to guns, not Bibles.” Even if you are avidly against legal possession of firearms yourself, I beg you to consider that there can be nothing so permanent as a temporary suspension of your rights. If you do not fervently defend your rights now, then when will you? After they have been whittled away from you in entirety? When that proverbial ‘little old lady’ is hauled away under armed guard? The world you live in tomorrow will be decided by what you believe in and stand for today. Choose wisely.

Jonathan RF Cooke
August 20th, 2007

For more articles ...
[ Go to the main blog of Jonathan Cooke at
http://coffee.townhall.com ]
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »